First man on the moon fake
The Soviets built huge rockets and other lunar hardware but lost the race. Secondly the USA was competing with the USSR to get the first man on the moon. If it WAS faked then by now someone from the inside would have blown the whistle and written a book about how it was done and made millions.
OK I' ll answer this in English with two points:įirstly all the people who claim it was a fake and a huge conspiracy are constantly trying to break through that perceived veil of secrecy to find out what really went on in the Apollo program in the sixties. I could go on, but I should let others play, too. Yeah boy - BIG studio! BRIGHT light! (Brighter than anything humans have ever invented.)īut wait! Countless other videos show the dust and the flags behaving EXACTLY as they should in an airless environment with 1/6 the earth' s gravity. This would mean that the light source would have to be at least a mile away too, to the LEFT. Yeah, BIG studio!īut wait! The shadows on the rover parts and the rocks don' t change at all during the trip and the light intensity doesn' t change, either. This would mean that the 'backdrop' would have had to be at least a mile away. Big studio.īut wait! If you carefully measure the features on the horizon and compare them from the beginning of the clip to the end, there is no noticeable difference in size.
The longer of these would indicate an excursion of about 400 feet. There are two sequences of rover video which are continuous and uncut for 20 to 35 seconds, showing the lunar surface passing by at a speed of at least 10 miles an hour.